Wednesday, 10 February 2016

INITIAL REACTION TO PLAY


At the end of year 12, we were given a ‘blurb’ of each play, and the one that stuck out to me the most because of its description and name was ‘The Devils’ by John Whiting. I liked the dark and disturbing nature of it, the fact that main character, Sister Jeanne, was a nun who became possessed – or didn’t – because of her lust for a Priest, and convinced her Sisters to join her in the pretentious act of possession by demons. I found it ironic that all the characters were supposed to be people of God, doing their duty to live a sinless and holy life, making it their duty to out those who sinned, when none of them were completely pure.

However, after reading the play, I felt disappointed as it wasn’t as intense or gradually climatic as I had presumed. It seemed to have a continual theme of sadness, guilt, tragedy; everything negative, and pessimistic. And when there were aspects of love and redemption, it was immediately ceased as if nothing good could come of this world.



Furthermore, what annoyed me most was the ignorant, selfish and misguided beliefs of the characters, specifically highlighting main characters Grandier and Sister Jeanne, were Catholic. I believe everyone has the right to practice their chosen religion as long as it doesn’t affect anyone else, and I respect the beliefs and ideals of that religion, however, these two characters took it too far; they used their belief as an excuse; that their actions were of a higher power, instead of accepting responsibility.

For example, when Grandier finds out that Phillipe is pregnant he leaves her as he feels to have a child is a curse, that he is being punished for loving someone other than God. Yet, I feel the genuine reason he leaves her is because he doesn’t want the ‘burden’ of having a child, and cannot be bothered to look after or care for anyone other than himself. He takes the time and care to pleasure himself with women around the town without a second thought, although to many people that could be considered an unholy act, and marries a girl without the blessing of her father, his supposed friend - whose trust he breaks by impregnating her - then ditches her when he’s had enough.

Another prime example of the egotistical nature of some of these characters is when Sister Jeanne becomes possessed and convinces the other Sisters to be so too. Although the priest has done a lot to some women around the town, he has done nothing to Jeanne – he hasn’t even met her, and doesn’t until he’s royally humiliated and tortured. Nevertheless, after having impure thoughts about him, and when she offers him an offer to become the Father of her convent he politely refuses, she goes on a determined voyage, that takes an unsettling turn, to destroy him mentally, emotionally, and finally, physically. And until the very end they all believe it was a just deed, that he deserved it.

This play is set in the 17th Century – 1600’s – Loudun, France. Going back to the past, more than one hundred years ago - frankly more than 50 years ago - has never been something I’ve enjoyed, particularly so when the era I must visit is similar to periods I’ve learnt about in secondary school. It bores me. I feel like I’m in a history lesson; as if I must go back to times when equality was at an all-time low, homophobia the ordinary, and let’s not start on racism. Times when things were in greater peril than they are today - as it often seems to be with history.

I enjoy learning about history that’s mostly speculated at; periods that still hold some mystery. Such as: the Egyptians, or the mystery of the BC years, exploring a time when we were cavepeople, when we lived among dinosaurs, or the birth of Buddism. When I take a trip to the past, I prefer it to be something different and new to the daily historical debate.

And so for these reasons, after my first reading of ‘The Devils’ I wasn’t convinced I wanted to be a part of it.


No comments:

Post a Comment